6 Matches (out of a total of 833 incidents)
  1. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    16/01/1999 Granbury, TX MAL 40 260 Y/?    
    Description: The deceased's canopy openned normally. It looked like he wouldn't be able to make it back to the DZ, but his canopy looked ok. Several pilots observed him spiraling rapidly which wasn't normal for him and a rigger who later inspected his canopy said that one toggle had never been released and that his glove was caught in the other brake line.
    Lessons:Two incidents involving gloves... I'm not sure what to say. More info on this one appreciated
  2. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    26/07/2003 Eagles Skydiving, TX MAL 57 ?/?   #587657
    Description: The jumper was going to get off of student status that weekend. She went up to practice her graduation dive. front loop, back loop right 360, left 360. She did the sequence and then turned to track. Then she went into a slow turn until she pulled around 1000 - 1300 ft. Her canopy had a few line twists and it looked like it pinned her head down. I guess that she got nervous and cut away without checking her altimeter and landed under a partially inflated reserve. The altiometer didnt look like it was damaged on the outside, and the needle was resting on zero. The cypress did fire and the rig had an RSL. And she pulled the reserve handle. Everyone was shocked that she pulled under the hard deck. She always pulled when she was supposed to, even if she was on her back.
    Lessons:
  3. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    15/01/2005 Skydive Dallas, TX MAL 47 99 Y/Y 82 #1436621
    Description: The deceased took part in a freeflyer skydive, broke off at 5,00 feet, and deployed at 3,000 feet. The deceased's canopy opened with line twists which he had cleared by 2000 feet. At approximately 300 feet the canopy started a left-hand spiral and continued until impact. It is suspected that the slider had come down past the soft link slider stop on the left rear riser, and the right toggle was unstowed, creating a left-hand turn.

    The deceased was the brother of another recent incident

    Lessons:
    USPA Description: After an uneventful freefall, this jumper was observed to enter a spin under canopy at about 300 feet that continued until impact in a remote area. After a short search, rescuers found the jumper and administered first aid until a doctor pronounced him dead at the scene.
    USPA Conclusions:Witnesses reported seeing this jumper deploy at approximately 3,000 feet and open with line twists that continued until the jumper finally cleared them at approximately 1,500 feet. At that point, he was observed to be flying the parachute toward the drop zone. To the witnesses, the canopy appeared to be flying normally prior to the fatal spin. However, inspection of the gear revealed that the left brake system was still locked and stowed, with the right one released. The left-rear slider grommet was below the connector link and around the stowed brake system, constricting and possibly jamming it. The right-rear slider grommet was below the connector link on its riser but above the steering toggle and control-line guide ring. Both of the slider. drawstrings were locked in the collapsed position. Several possible scenarios could explain this accident, but it is difficult to conclude without knowing the jumper’s habits after opening or in what order he might have been reacting to routine equipment problems endemic to his slider, riser and brake system combination. The right-side brake could have released at any time: during deployment, while he was trying to free the line twist or while he was trying to collapse or stow the slider. Alternatively, the jumper could have released the right-side brake himself during the course of events that followed. The left-rear slider grommet could have jammed over the brake system during opening, while the jumper was collapsing the slider or while he was trying to pull the slider below the brake system to stow it. Or he may have attempted to release the brakes, discovered the jam, then wrestled with the problem below a safe altitude to cut away. Most jumpers adjust the slider soon after opening, but they must keep track of altitude when problems arise with the system to leave enough time to cut away from trouble. Care is required to prevent a premature brake release and to prevent the slider from later interfering with the brake system. Stowing the slider below the brake system requires even greater care and can result in more problems. In any case, a control problem below a safe cutaway altitude leaves a jumper with few choices. The only viable option may be to counter the turn by pulling the opposite control and prepare for a hard landing and PLF. Flaring may or may not be an option, but a jumper should determine this on a practice jump at a higher altitude. The medical cause of death was a torn aorta, which could result from a hard opening or a hard landing. In this case, there was no evidence of a hard opening. Jumpers should pick an altitude by which they will cut away the main parachute if it’s not already in a condition to land. The SIM recommends 2,500 feet for students and A-license holders and 1,800 feet for B license and up. This jumper’s better choice would have been to work with the canopy until that altitude, then cut away and deploy the reserve.
  4. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    01/05/2005 Skydive Dallas, TX DMAL 55 3700 Y/N 113 #1622148
    Description: The jumper had taken part in an uneventful 10-way RW jump and suffered a malfunction. He cutaway, but it appears that only the right riser released before he deployed the reserve. The reserve pilot chute and canopy in the freebag wrapped around the main. The reserve then extracted from the freebag and the descent was slowed, and he was able to release the other riser but the main further entangled, causing the canopies to spiral into the ground. CPR was initiated very quickly by a doctor who was on the jump and a dropzone employee who is an EMT, to no avail.
    DropZone.com Lessons:One or more of his lines wrapped around the left main side flap." Sun Path co-owner Derek Thomas told SKYDIVING last month. There were friction burn marks on the flap. Also, the "bottom-corner boxing" of the left-hand corner of the main container was ripped open to within an inch or so of the pack tray, Thomas said, indicating considerable force had been applied to the side flap. Thomas believes the left-hand riser didn't separate from the harness for that reason.
    USPA Description: After an uneventful 9-way formation skydive, this jumper deployed his main parachute at 2,000 feet. The canopy opened into a distorted shape and immediately began to spin. At approximately 1,200 feet, he pulled his cutaway handle and deployed the reserve, but the main canopy was apparently entangled with some part of the jumper’s equipment and failed to fully release. The main and reserve canopies entangled and then began to spin violently for the remainder of his descent, and the jumper was killed on landing.
    USPA Conclusions:Investigators found friction burns on the container’s left-side main flap, indicating that a line from the main canopy may have wrapped around it during deployment. This type of entanglement would explain the distorted main canopy and could have also resulted in the inability to fully release the malfunctioned canopy after pulling the cutaway handle. It did not remain entangled, however, and investigators at the scene found the main canopy and risers detached from the container and entangled with the reserve canopy. The offending line or lines may have eventually slipped off the main flap. The harness and container manufacturer and the FAA inspected the system but could not explain the cause for the entanglement with the container. This jumper deployed his main canopy at 2,000 feet, which provided minimum working time to assess any problems and initiate emergency procedures. Section 5 of the Skydiver’s Information Manual recommends that skydivers decide on and execute emergency procedures no lower than 2,500 feet for students and A-license holders and 1,800 feet for B- through D-license holders. Main canopy deployment at 2,000 feet allows little time to recognize a situation and act by 1,800 feet. Additional altitude may have provided the jumper time to attempt to clear the entanglement before having to resort to the reserve with the main still attached—although numerous accident reports describe jumpers trying to clear such complicated problems and losing track of their remaining altitude. With so little altitude available, this jumper chose the only probable solution: Cut away and immediately deploy the reserve.
  5. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    07/11/2007 Skydive Spaceland, TX MAL 35 109 Y/N 314 #3009967
    DropZone.com Description: Jumper was doing a solo jump on a sunset load mid week. He was found 2 days later in the middle of a field. He appears to have sort of high speed malfunction on the main canopy and then proceded to cutaway at a low altitude. The reserve was out of its bag but no indication on how inflated it was when he struck the ground. News reports indicate he survived the landing long enough to climb out of his harness and crawl about 10 feet before he died.
    Lessons:
    USPA Description: This jumper exited last out of a Cessna Caravan for a solo skydive. There were no witnesses to his freefall, deployment or landing. Almost 48 hours after the jump took place, his body was discovered lying in a field just off of airport property. Investigators found his harness and container approximately 30 feet from where he was located with his reserve canopy deployed. His main canopy was found nearby, released from the harness and container system and trapped in its deployment bag. The jumper's hard landing under his reserve canopy had resulted in serious injuries, including a broken leg, ankle, pelvis and two cervical vertebrae, as well as head injuries. Since he was found away from his harness and container system, investigators determined that he must have survived the initial impact but died of his injuries before he was found or able to get help.
    USPA Conclusions:

    Investigators found this jumper's gear with the reserve deployed, the reserve's slider all the way down to the risers and both brakes still stowed. The cutaway handle had been pulled, but the reserve ripcord handle was still attached to the harness. The main canopy had released from the harness and was found nearby, still in its deployment bag due to a bag lock malfunction. The main canopy, cutaway handle, reserve pilot chute and freebag were all found within a 20-yard radius of the jumper, which would indicate that the cutaway and reserve deployment took place at very low altitudes, likely lower than 1,000 feet above the ground. The jumper likely struck the ground before his reserve had a chance to fully inflate and slow him down to a survivable descent rate.

    After deploying his main canopy, the jumper apparently experienced a bag lock malfunction; however, it's impossible to determine at what altitude he deployed his main. Investigators concluded that the jumper's automatic activation device had deployed his reserve parachute since the reserve closing loop had been cut by the unit's cutter and the reserve ripcord was still in its pocket on the main lift web of the harness. The rig was equipped with a reserve static line, but it was not connected to either riser, and it's unclear whether it was disconnected before or during the jump. Evidence at the scene indicated that the reserve canopy had inflated but did not have enough time to fully slow the jumper before he struck the ground.

    Investigators could not determine at what altitude this jumper initiated main canopy deployment. Skydiver's Information Manual Section 2-1 requires that students and A-license holders deploy no lower than 3,000 feet above the ground to allow enough altitude for them to properly handle a main canopy malfunction, with minimum altitudes of 2,500 feet for B-license holders and 2,000 feet for C- and D-license holders. Section 5-1 recommends students and A-license holders decide upon and take action to initiate emergency procedures by 2,500 feet, while B- through D-license holders should do so by 1,800 feet.

    Although this jumper pulled his cutaway handle at some point, it's unclear at what altitude. It's also unknown whether his AAD had already deployed his reserve while the main risers and main deployment bag were still attached or if he pulled his cutaway handle to release his main canopy before the AAD activated the reserve. The investigator did not report finding any friction burns on either canopy or line set, indicating that the main and reserve canopies most likely did not rub together during deployment and that the jumper apparently pulled his cutaway handle and released his main canopy before the AAD deployed his reserve.

    If the RSL had been hooked up to the main risers, the reserve deployment may have been initiated sooner, saving precious altitude and possibly providing more time for the reserve to slow the jumper before landing. Although the AAD had cut the reserve loop, investigators did not return the unit to the manufacturer to determine what altitude the device actually activated the reserve. According to a representative from the AAD's U.S.-based service center, at least two reasons could explain the low reserve deployment in this jumper's situation: The AAD may have activated the reserve at the unit's preset altitude of 750 feet, but the reserve canopy could have experienced a hesitation during some stage of the deployment and inflation. Just a short delay in any part of the reserve deployment would be enough to make a difference between a safe descent rate and striking the ground at a high rate of speed while the reserve was still inflating. The representative suggested that another possibility was that the inflated main pilot chute and deployment bag may have provided enough drag to slow the jumper below the 78 mph descent rate required to activate the unit. If this was the case and the jumper had pulled his cutaway handle somewhere around 750 feet or slightly higher, it would have taken him a few seconds to reach the necessary speed to activate the AAD, thus initiating the reserve deployment lower than the normal activation height. Still, without the data from the unit or any witness accounts, it's impossible to determine exactly why the reserve did not have enough altitude to slow the jumper to a safe descent rate.

    The jumper initially survived the landing, as indicated by the fact that he had removed his rig and was found 30 feet away from his gear. However, either no one noticed that he had not returned from the jump or people thought he had intentionally landed near his trailer where he stayed on the drop zone since it was the last jump of the day. If a skydiver doesn't plan to return to the regular landing area or packing hangar after a jump, he should tell at least one other jumper on the load his plan and make a phone call to manifest after he lands to let them know he landed uneventfully. Some drop zones use a system that requires each jumper to check in with manifest after each load, which can help the DZ determine if a jumper is missing so a search can begin immediately if necessary.

    Lastly, the toxicology test conducted on the jumper following the accident indicated a positive test result for the presence of marijuana in a concentration strong enough that the lab technician said the jumper was more than likely under the influence of the drug at the time of his accident. Jumping while under the influence of drugs or alcohol has resulted in injuries and fatalities in the past and is prohibited by the FAA and USPA for good reason. Drugs and alcohol can slow reaction times and cause many other adverse reactions that can lead to skydiving injuries and fatalities.

  6. Date Location Category Age # Jumps AAD?/RSL? Dropzone.com Report Dropzone.com Discussion
    12/03/2008 Skydive Spaceland, TX MAL 58 9 Y/Y 326 #3151399
    DropZone.com Description:

    Jumper went unstable while trying to pull for his main parachute on one of his last AFF dives and was tumbling when his AAD activated. The reserve deployed but became entangled with the jumper as it was opening and was prevented from opening correctly. The jumper landed with a partially deployed reserve canopy.

    The instructor chased the student to under 1200 feet when he deployed his main and ended up having an AAD activation and dual canopy deployment.

    Lessons:
    USPA Description: This jumper was performing his ninth skydive, a freefall training jump with a USPA AFF Instructor. This was his seventh AFF training jump following two tandems. After an uneventful initial freefall, this jumper did not initiate his main deployment at the assigned deployment altitude of 5,500 feet. When his instructor gave him a pull sign, the student reached for his bottom-of-container-mounted throw-out pilot chute but grabbed the leg gripper of his jumpsuit instead. As the instructor moved to dock on him to assist with his deployment, the student reached across his own torso with his left hand in an apparent attempt to deploy using that hand. The student then flipped on his back and tumbled away from the instructor, who continued to chase the student to a reported altitude of 1,500 feet before deploying his own main canopy. The student remained in freefall, never deploying his main or reserve parachute. His AAD did deploy his reserve, but the reserve pilot chute and bridle entangled with his arm and stopped the reserve deployment.
    USPA Conclusions:

    There were no indications of freefall stability problems in any of this jumper’s previous training skydives. He had successfully met the required tasks on each jump and had also accumulated 40 to 45 minutes of training in a wind tunnel. He may have panicked after realizing he had grabbed his jumpsuit gripper instead of his main pilot chute handle. When he reached across his body toward his right hip with his left arm, it caused him to flip on his back and tumble away from the instructor. The student then appeared to attempt to roll over face to earth, but his de-arched body position kept him in a back-to-earth position.

    Skydiver’s Information Manual Section 5-1 recommends that jumpers deploy at an appropriate altitude (no lower than 3,000 feet AGL for students) in a stable, face-to-earth body position; however, a jumper’s priority is to pull at the correct altitude, regardless of body position. SIM Section 4 recommends that students who do not find their main deployment handle on their first try make no more than two additional attempts to locate the handle. If a student still cannot deploy his main, he should immediately pull his reserve ripcord. Although deploying in a face-to-earth position is ideal, it’s more important to deploy at the assigned altitude, regardless of body position. In most cases, a main canopy deployment while a jumper is back to earth has resulted in a successful opening without any malfunction or entanglement.

    The automatic activation device did activate this jumper’s reserve at some point, but it’s unknown at what altitude. Investigators found the student with his reserve pilot chute trapped under his arm, with approximately eight feet of reserve bridle out of the container and wrapped around his torso and right arm. This indicates that the reserve deployed while the jumper was spinning on his back, which caused his arm to trap the reserve pilot chute and bridle instead of the pilot chute finding clean air to deploy the reserve.

    Just as deploying a main while back to earth almost always results in a normal deployment, the same is true for reserve canopies; entanglements such as this between the jumper and the deploying reserve canopy or its pilot chute or freebag are rare, even if the reserve is deployed in a less-than-desirable body position. Had the reserve pilot chute not been trapped by the jumper’s arm, the result would likely have been a fully deployed reserve parachute.

    The instructor attempted to dock with the student once he saw him experiencing a problem with his deployment but was unable to dock and assist before the student rolled over and tumbled away. AFF instructors are trained and evaluated in assisting with student deployments, and it’s a good idea for AFF instructors to stay no more than an arm’s length from each student whenever possible, even when students are performing well during a skydive. All instructors are trained to deploy their own main canopy no lower than 2,000 feet, regardless of whether the student has deployed. The report indicated that this instructor initiated his main canopy deployment at 1,500 feet. By the time his main canopy inflated and began to slow his descent, his AAD had activated his reserve canopy. Even though both canopies inflated properly and he landed without incident, the low deployment placed him at additional risk of a main-reserve entanglement.